Yew as You

Standard

I hope you’ll check out a repost from last summer. It’s called “Yew as You.” It’s about interconnections throughout the ecosphere & across time. Thanks, ever so, for your time and attention.

Sally Wengrover, Ph.D.

What I’m about to say will probably seem odd, because we tend to see ourselves as separate and distinct from our surroundings, but the boundary between us and the environment is not a distinct line—as in, we’re here inside our skins and the environment is over there outside us. In fact, the boundary between us and not-us is a blur.

In case this notion of blurry boundaries sounds bizarre, I’ve included a few brief examples of our fuzzy edges below.

Let’s start with food. When we eat, we incorporate into our bodies atoms that resided in a living plant or animal body until the very recent past. A few hours after we eat, some lucky microbes will be blessed with the opportunity to dine on elements of our (to be delicate) digestive waste, and after that, larger critters will feast on those delectable little microbes. Even further down the line…

View original post 678 more words

Will It Begin Today?

Standard

As I mentioned in earlier posts (“Hat’s Off” and “Floating down the River . . .”), I’m aware that scaring people about the deteriorating health of the environment can be counterproductive. People who are frightened and see no way to fight back are inclined to go out and buy more stuff, surround themselves with comforting things, and distract themselves from the source of their fears. I’m equally aware that the way we’re living is unsustainable. In the process of tearing through resources and pumping out waste, we’re racking up a long list of environmental bills. Sadly, our children and grandchildren will be forced to cope somehow when those bills come due.

Knowing those facts, I walk around with my hair on fire under my hat, wanting to grab people by the collar and shake them till my hat (or theirs) falls off, and shout: “Don’t you realize what’s happening? Don’t you understand that we’re all contributing to environmental problems by buying a lot of stuff we don’t need? Don’t you know that there are environmental costs to all the stuff we buy? Species extinctions, groundwater depletion and pollution, soil erosion, desertification, endocrine disruption, climate change, ocean acidification, and on and on. You’d better take these problems seriously and do everything you can to fix ’em, or there’s a very good chance that down the road your kids and grandkids are gonna curse your memory.

The problem with that idea (in addition to the risk of having my lights punched out by some temperamental soul who doesn’t appreciate being shaken by the collar and screamed at) is that few of us are inclined to deny ourselves the pleasure of buying new things — especially if we suspect that our choices will not affect the environment one way or the other. And, in fact, most of us realize that environmental problems are so enormous that the effects of our little, individual indulgences (or sacrifices) are truly insignificant.

So what we’ve got here is one big — and growing — environmental mess. With each day that we fail to reduce our burden on the ecosphere in the present, we compound the difficulty of correcting environmental problems in the future. And because we believe that our own actions are largely irrelevant, we passively wait for government regulations or technological innovations to descend from above, deus-ex-machina style, and fix all of our problems for us.

The trouble with the sit-around-and-wait strategy is that it ain’t workin’. The government is hobbled and nearly dysfunctional. Republicans not only oppose new environmental regulations, they want to roll back most of the ones that are already in force. While the President can issue some executive orders for the sake of the environment, his ability to make big changes is limited. As for technological solutions, to be brief, inventions that help the environment in one way generally (perhaps inevitably) harm it in other ways. Beyond that, the ecosphere is unraveling along a multitude of seams. Even if we could develop side-effect-free technologies (which isn’t going to happen), we can’t invent and deploy those technologies fast enough to mend all the rips and frayed edges.

So it’s up to each of us to cut our unnecessary consumption and thereby reduce the wear and tear we inflict on the planet. Since one person’s consumption reduction has no appreciable impact on the environment, what we need is a movement — an anti-consumerist movement — to sweep the nation and the world. With the release today of Pope Francis’s encyclical on the environment, that movement may be about to begin.

One More Time: So Why Am I Blogging?

Standard

Hey there, Blog Readers!

For a number of reasons, I haven’t been blogging lately. I hope to start adding new posts soon, but till then, I will repost some old stuff. 

Here’s one of my first: “So Why Am I Blogging?”  I hope you like it.

Thanks so much for taking the time to visit my blog!


*       *       *       *       *       *       *       *       *       *       *       *       *


SO WHY AM I BLOGGING?

Let me begin, Dear Reader, by explaining that this blogging business goes against my grain. In the past, I’ve been shy about expressing my opinions, especially when they imply criticism of other people’s opinions and values.

Nevertheless, I intend to speak out—as often and as forcefully as I can about the ecological impact of consumerism—because I’m convinced that our out-of-control consumption is causing the environment to unravel at an accelerating rate. If we hope to inhabit a planet that is healthy enough to afford decent lives in the decades to come, we’d better start shifting our values from maximizing consumption to nurturing living things now.

For consumption-reduction to have a significant environmental impact, a whole lot of people must make that shift. My blog alone won’t bring about the shift, of course, but, with any luck, a rapidly expanding chorus of voices will succeed in spreading the message and produce a critical mass of shifters, intent on bringing us back from the environmental brink.